WebAnswer: The New King James is not a King James Bible. It changed thousands of words, ruined valuable verses, and when not agreeing with the King James Bible, it has instead copied the perverted NIV, NASV or RSV. And this you must know: those who translated the NKJV did not believe God perfectly preserved His words! WebJan 4, 2024 · King James Version - Sample Verses. John 1:1, 14 – “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.”. John 3:16 – “For God so loved the world, that he ...
Chick.com: What
WebThere have even been “updates” (more revisions) of some of the revised versions of the King James Version, the New American Standard Version being an example. So then the most “Inerrant” English Bible translation, according to the KJV-only fundamentalists, is actually the most changed and revised version on the market. WebOct 21, 2024 · In fact, Bibles have been removing and adding (and then removing again) verses since Bibles were first put together. And I knew that the King James wasn’t (and … google play cc
The KJV 1611 vs. The New Translations - Biblebelievers.com
WebBecause the King James Bible is in the publick domain and not copyrighted, these worldly publishing companies think they can make minor changes to the standard text so that they can please certain groups which translates into extra sales for them. That's the way the modern world operates to day. WebApr 19, 2024 · The Bible has not only recently been changed, it has always been subject to change. The Bible warns of dire consequences for those who alter its words, in several different books and verses. … WebAs well, in several centuries, the English language itself had undergone significant changes. In the 1870s, serious work began on a major revision of the King James Version to reflect all of these new realities. A committee … chicken arms exercise